Friday, April 28, 2017

Forming of opinion


How to form opinion?
The techniques and reasons for scrutiny are explained in previous article based on which genuineness of the deed can be found, then the proplawyer has to discuss probable challenges, disputes, etc and then form a opinion on flow of title and its marketability
While reading the deed, the reader shall apparently understand and form an opinion that the executant has executed the deed out of free mind without coercion, influence. It is not sufficient that the deed has a mention about the free will and wish of the executant.

How the vendor has got the ownership is to be identified. Whether it is a self acquired one or ancestral one, if  it is a ancestral, whether he has got partitioned the property are the questions to be asked and the answers are to be found. The ancestral property becomes a self acquired one on partition of the same. Otherwise, it is to be checked whether the vendor has 100% share over the property or lesser undivided share. For this, the proplawyer has to scrutinize the present deed and its previous deeds.
By any act of the parties viz., SD, Will, settlement, release, partition, succession, gift, assignment, decree, adverse possession or by the operation of law, the present owner might have got the ownership. To find whether the property has properly devolved on or transferred to the executant, the present deed and its previous documents are to be scrutinized.
Root document is one from which the title devolves ownership and documents prior to this document are not needed. There is no definite procedure to what extent and what period, the previous deed are to perused. However, it is advised as a general rule to scrutinize the deeds for a period of 30 years. If the title is not ascertained within 30 years or no transaction has happened in last 30 years or root document is beyond 30 years, it becomes necessary to make search and investigation beyond 30 years up to the root of title and peruse the same.
For example, in 1972, a woman acquired a land, constructed a house in 1974, and later expired in 2002. Her one son released his half share in favour his brother in 2004. Now, the root document is the document of the year 1972, which beyond 40 years. Hence, the search has to be made up to 1972
Next, nature of right/ ownership, the seller/ owner has over the property also to be found out. The ownership may be absolute or limited or conditional. Absolute means complete ownership which allows the owner to alienate the property. Limited ownership means nothing but lifetime estate, he has no alienation rights as such the owner can enjoy the yields of the property and cannot mortgage, create any charge, lien or encumbrance over the property or sell the property.
Genuineness by witnesses
The next important, usually avoided, stage of scrutinizing is perusal of witnesses. They play a very important role in proving the execution of the deed by the executant in clear mind and also act as a human identity device. They shall prevent any claim, disputes, challenges and hence it becomes necessary to check the relationship between the witness and the executant or claimant. The importance of witness is clearly discussed previously under the title scrutinizing of deeds and under the heading witness.
Probable challenges, disputes, claims
Next, the proplawyer shall imagine whether the property may subject to any challenges, by the legal heirs of executant in future, based on the contents of the deed on hand, the devolution of property or from the heirs of previous owners.
The reason for deed is also to be studied, it may be noted that the cost of registration for Settlement Deed and General Power of Attorney (GPA) are comparatively very less and for that reason more cheatings and frauds are happened through settlement deeds and GPA. In case of settlement deed, the reason for excluding other deserving persons/ heirs is also to be found and in case of GPA, special scrutiny is needed on reason for non availability of original owner and circumstance behind appointing agent. Though it is discussed under the title, “Scrutiny of Deeds”, it is again told here considering the importance. If the proplawyer smells any  discrepancy, the client may be advised so.
The probable disputes by adjacent property owners are also to be imagined by comparing the schedule of the property, field measurement record, with the documents of the adjoining property. In normal practice, the neighbors won’t give the copies of their title deeds and hence the client may not be in a position to produce the same for scrutiny and opinion. We can get certified copy of documents of adjoining property from the registrar office. In such an event, it is to be advised to the client to measure the boundary of the property in presence of the owners of the adjoining properties.
Flawless document
Wordings of the document shall be carefully scrutinised as it communicates the motive of the deed. It shall not give any room for ambiguous matter or not be a matter of interpretation.
It shall not contain any error in it, otherwise it has to be advised to get it corrected by rectification deed. Sometimes, one part of a deed may be written in contrary to other part of deed, which may make the deed voidable.
For example:
This settlement deed was executed by a father in favour of his daughter excluding his son. He had stated that the transfer of property shall take effect after the lifetime of the executant. He further added a clause, as usually available in all sale deeds, that there is no charge, lien, encumbrance in the property and assured that he would clear them, if any, found later.
It is clear that the transfer shall take effect only after the life time of the executant and in the event of finding any lien or charge or encumbrance, the promise of clearing the same by the executant would not be possible when he would not be alive.
Thus the above guarantee clause is contrary to operative clause which shall direct us to a decision that executant had not understood the meaning of the contents of the settlement deed or in fact he did not study the document, which shall result in invalidating the document.
Tracing of title
Now, the title to be traced from the root and it is to be found whether the title is devolved properly on the present owner. Root document is one from which the title devolves ownership and documents prior to this document are not needed. There is no definite procedure to what extent and what period, the previous deed are to perused. However, it is advised as a general rule to scrutinize the deeds for a period of 30 years. If the title is not ascertained within 30 years or no transaction has happened in last 30 years or root document is beyond 30 years, it becomes necessary to make search and investigation beyond 30 years up to the root of title and peruse the same.
For example, in 1972, a woman acquired a land, constructed a house in 1974, and later expired in 2002. Her one son released his half share in favour his brother in 2004. Now, the root document is the document of the year 1972, which beyond 40 years. Hence, the search has to be made up to 1972
The client to be advised to see all the documents in original, if the vendor does not want to give them, being original, to the purchaser (the client here), the lawyer has to ask the vendor to bring the original deeds and to produce the same to the lawyer in order to verify and form a conclusive opinion.
Conditional transfer
Sometimes, the property is transferred on any condition . if any condition is found in a document, such conditions are to be examined. Sometimes, a condition may be imposed that the claimant has to pay certain amount periodically to the executant or to any person nominated by the executant as maintenance. In this case, if the claimant does not pay the maintenance as directed in the document, the transfer of property by that document becomes invalid.
The condition may be imposed restricting the alienation for a certain period or till the happening of a certain/ specific event. In this case, validity of the condition and the happening of a certain/ specific event have to be examined.
Time of effect
In some other cases, the transfer of property vide a deed may not come into effect immediately and it may transfer to the claimant after the lifetime of executant or on happening of a certain/ specific events. The client may be advised to verify the status of the condition and thus the validity of the deed.
For example, a property may be attached with (on sale of) another property as an guarantee. If the buyer of the property is selling suffering from any damages due to inadequacy of the title, the seller has to rectify the same in normal practice, but in this case, the buyer can acquire the title of the attached property as an indemnity or relief for damages. This guarantee may be for twelve years.
In this way, the buyer is not the owner of the attached property till the damage is happened and as such he cannot own or sell the same.
In some settlement cases/ gift cases, the transfer may take effect after the life time of the executant. Here, the proplawyer has to ensure that the present executant has got ownership and there is no condition restricting him away from alienation.
Lien, charge
Some transactions are unregistered as such they wont be reflected in encumbrance certificate. Just a deposit of title deed is enough to create equity mortgage which does not require any instrument or its registration. Many banks advanced and advances loan against the property on deposit of original title deeds. Like this lease, easement, any order of a Court are not registered. Wills/ codicils are also need not be registered and as such not reflected in encumbrance certificate.
Hence, it is advisable to inspect the documents in original and also to publish notice, if needed, in local news paper and ask for any objection in order to get convinced that the property is not affected by or subjected to any claim due to any lien, charge, etc.
Forming of opinion
After going through all documents and deeds and seeing them in original, the solicitor can understand whether the property has devolved on the present owner properly, the title has transferred to him or herself legally.
Then the solicitor shall find any restriction available or imposed on usage of the property and condition to alienate the property. After ensuring the same, the lawyer shall check for probable dispute, challenge, claims, frauds, etc on the previous deeds for which lien, charge, encumbrance are to be scrutinized.
The lawyer shall have to confirm there is no proposal by government for land acquisition for any project or any public purpose or any proceedings under land ceiling Act or any other Acts. For which, the lawyer may have to get information from revenue department, Taluk Office. And then finally, ownership is to be ensured.
If findings on all the above are in the affirmative, jurisprudence/ judicial conscience shall form an opinion that the present owner is conferred with ownership rights and the title is clear and marketable.
If any finding is negative, the lawyer shall have to take a decision, as discussed in this book at various places under various headings in order to advice the client suitably and accordingly.

Making of Report of Opinion on Title
After framing the opinion, the prop-lawyer has to convey his formed opinion on the title of the property in a report form, which may contain the following:
·         Description of property
·         List of documents scrutinised (original, Xerox)
·         Devolution of title of property
·         Probable challenges (Optional)
·         Opinion
In addition to this, the lawyer has to issue a covering letter addressed to the client stating the short version or abstract of his opinion in aout 25 words duly enclosing the report.


Scrutiny of deeds

Methods of scrutiny, Area of focus, Etc
Scrutiny of deeds
1.     Name of deed

There are various deeds available whereby an immovable property could be transferred.  One may think what is significance in verifying the name of the deed that is being scrutinized.
There are possibilities of errors in mentioning the name of deed. It may be typographical error or inadvertent one due to copy and paste or oversight error. These errors shall not change the intention of the deed.
When the deeds are prepared fraudulently by impersonation or any other deceits, there is a possibility in committing mistakes called psychological mistakes, which may include wrongly entering the name of the deed.
As an expert, the lawyer can identify the nature of error or mistake and the knowledge for the same he could gain by experience.
2.     Place of execution
It is the place where the executant has signed all the papers/ pages of the deed and acted as per the deed.   
If the address of the executant differs from the place of execution, the solicitor has to place some vigil on the scrutiny as there is a possibility for impersonated execution.
3.     Date of execution
     The date of execution by the parties is to be noted. If the deed is executed by many persons at different times all the dates are to be noted by the lawyer. (Registration Act, Section-26 permits the execution at different times)
4.     Date of registration
Normally, the executed document has to be registered within four months of time from the date of execution. If the deed is executed by several persons at different times, the deed can be presented for registration within four months from the date of each execution.
Here the solicitor has to verify whether the document has been registered within the stipulated period.
5.     Name of executant(s)
Normally, it is expected that the executant acquires the right over the property through its previous deed.  So the in order to ensure the link, the solicitor has to verify the name of claimant in the previous deed. If the name, expansion of initial, father name and the identity of the executant of present deed perfectly match with that of claimant of previous deed, one can say the title of the property passed from previous deed to present deed.
If any change in the name of executant in the deed on hand from the name of claimant in the previous deed, the lawyer has to scrutiny the deed with a view to find the reason for the same.
Generally, in the event of death of claimant of previous deed, his legal heirs would execute the present deed on hand which is being scrutinized. In such events, death certificate of the claimant of the pre-deed and his/ her legal heir certificate are to be studied and scrutinized. It is also to be checked whether all the heirs executed the present deed on hand. In rare cases, where Court Decrees might have put the executant in possession of the property, the decrees have to be scrutinised. In any cases, the reason for change has to be scrutinized and a convincing fact to be found.
6.     Age of executant(s)
Like the name, the age of the executant in the present deed is also to be compared with that of the claimant in the previous deed. In normal case, it may not affect the title of the property much. However, it may be noted that in the deeds prepared fraudulently and registered by impersonation, the age of fraudulent executant shall be mentioned. If any abnormality is found, that is wide difference with the age of original owner, that has to be investigated.
7.     Address of executant(s)
If the address of the executant differs from the place of execution, the solicitor has to place some vigil on the scrutiny as there is a possibility for impersonated execution.
If the address of the executant of present deed and that of claimant of previous deed are same but it is outstation, now also the lawyer has to place more vigil on the deed, as there is more possibility of fraudulent and impersonated execution without the knowledge of the original owner. Already we have discussed what impersonation is?
8.     Identity of executant
Like the name or address of the executant, the identity card is also play a very good role in finding the genuineness of the document. Hence, the proplawyer has to scrutinize the deed in comparison with the details found in the identity card. Readers are advised to read importance of perusal of identity card given in Various frauds found by identity card details. The lawyer has to scrutiny the identity card, expansion of initial, address and all comprehensively.
Example
On seeing two driving licenses on two deeds, got suspicion as one person can’t have two licenses and advised the client accordingly.
9.     Name of claimant/s s (Verify with successive deeds)
The name of the claimant and his father/ husband also has to be noted and to be verified with the executant of successive documents. If the convincing reason to be found on any difference from successive executant, one can proceed further. Otherwise, the process of scrutiny and thus the proposal of purchase by the client may be made a halt.
10.            Age of claimant/s (Compare with successive deeds)
For the reasons stated above under the heading “Age of executant”, the age of claimant also has to be compared with the successive deeds.
In a search, it is observed that the age of claimant is subsequently reduced after some years in a sale deed when he sold the property. On further scrutiny, it is found that the deed is a forged one and the person has represented as claimant of previous deed.
11.            Identity of claimant
For the reasons stated above under the heading “Identity of executant”, the identity of claimant also has to be compared with successive deeds.
12.            Witness
The proplawyer shall have good knowledge about witness, their role during execution of document, importance of witnesses.
Details of the witnesses, attesting and identifying, shall be legible and readable from the document. It shall contain name, father/ husband name, clear and full address of the witness such that the witness shall be easily identifiable, traceable and approachable in order to prove the execution of the document and also the possession of the by the executant in case of any challenge, claim or dispute. As such, the witness shall not be a ‘on the spot’ or ‘caught’ witness, who are usually available on the verandah/ payal of the sub registrar office.
13.                           Whether executant has absolute marketable right/ title?
Now, the proplawyer has to find whether the present owner has absolute right of ownership over the piece of property and it is marketable and clear.
For which, investigation has to be made to ensure that the property is properly devolved as per succession or transferred as per Acts on the executant and the uninterrupted continuous possession to be ensured.
It is advised to read the matter regarding title to have knowledge about Marketability and clearness of title
14.            Whether he is in exclusive possession?
Actual possession means a right to have and retain the property until it is challenged and the contrary is proved. To know about possession, separate article given in previous pages may be read.
15.            Devolution of property
Now, the proplawyer has to find how the executant got the property?
By any act of the parties viz., SD, Will, settlement, release, partition, succession, gift, assignment, decree, adverse possession or by the operation of law, the present owner might have got the ownership. To find whether the property has properly devolved on or transferred to the executant, the present deed and its previous documents are to be scrutinized.
16.            Reason for/ Circumstances behind transaction
The proplawyer shall ensure that the circumstance behind the transaction is/ was clearly spelt out in the deed. In the absence of mention or the ambiguity or non clarity about the reason for transaction, one may expect some challenges.
For example, wife of the executant may challenge the document that it was made to get executed by his husband by the influence of alcohol.
If the document is settlement deed in favour of only one heir, the reason for exclusion of other heirs must be spelt out, otherwise those other heirs may challenge that the deed was got executed due to influence.
If it is a sale and the reason is found that family loan or to meet the family expenditure, to the possible extent, the deed shall tell the loan account number, bank, etc or the detail of expenditure. Otherwise, the other members of the family shall raise problem on the ground that they had no loan at all or they were not in a position to meet any expenditure and the reason for sale as mentioned in the sale deed is invented for the purpose of the document.
As such, the lawyer shall see the sound reason for transaction, if it is not clear, he may ask his client to find or clarify with the seller the reason and no challenge over it. If  the deed was executed long back, it may not be taken so seriously as the possibility of challenges got distinguished.
17.            Consideration
Consideration is the price of property in case of sale deed. It might be paid or promised to pay or partly paid or promised to pay the remaining. The unpaid seller has lien over the property. The consideration may be made before execution of (sale) deed, or at the time of execution of deed or at the time of registration of deed in presence of registering authority.
Consideration is the essential part of a transfer of property. However, the release deed may or may not have consideration in money form. The Gift and settlement has love and affection as its consideration.
The prop-lawyer has to ensure that the consideration is rightly calculated and paid fully and there is no further demand from the executants. If the consideration is paid in presence of registering official, the lawyer has to verify whether the Sub Registrar has made endorsement to this effect.
Though the amount of consideration is to be decided by the parties, it becomes the duty of the lawyer in order to safe guard the client from the future nuisance challenges by the heirs of the executant that the lower value has been fixed by the claimant and the claimant was made to accept by force or false representation or by influence of alcohol.

18.            Exclusion of possible executants
If the property is ancestral one, the root is remote and involves many branches the devolution of title has to be perused according to succession law and quantum of share in property to each branch has to be carefully calculated, otherwise it will steer to the problem of facing the dispute by possible coparcener.
In addition to this, the facts discussed in reason for transaction and importance of witnesses is also to be kept in mind while perusing the documents.
19.            Convince on non availability of certain data
Sometimes, some miscellaneous documents like death certificate, legal heir certificate may not be produced by the client or the present owner of the property and may not be available even after making search in relevant offices.
In such a situation, solicitor may make a decision, depends on the time passed, circumstance and also strength of other available documents, whether the non availability of such certificates/ documents would touch the clearness or marketability of title or not.
20.            Endorsement by SR
While registering the deed/ document, the registering authority (Sub Registrar) usually endorse details about the following.
                   i.      Presentation, the person who presented the document for registration and the time and date of presentation.
                 ii.      Execution admission, the person who admitted the execution of document.
              iii.      Claim admission, the person who claimed the property under this deed.
              iv.      Witness (Identity), the details about the identifying witnesses.
                 v.      No. of copies registered along with the original deed.
              vi.      Scan, doc. No, book no., volume, page no. no.of pages.
The proplawyer has to calculate the stamp duty, registration fee in relation to the value of the property. Mostly, stamp duty is paid vide non judicial stamp papers, but in some cases, the duty might be paid in cash or through demand draft at the time of registration, which the sub registrar would certify the same under section 42 of Registration Act.
The purpose of calculating and verifying the stamp duty is to ensure that the document is a genuine one and not forged or fabricated one. The cheaters would create the document fraudulently with lower valued stamp papers, wherein the exact wording of the registered document is reproduced making the reader to believe that the document is original but in fact the original document might have been deposited to any bank thus created equity mortgage or lien. The fake document might also be produced without changing the names of parties but with additional facts which are not available in the original deed, thus the document would be reflected in the encumbrance details.
The number of copies also to be verified, because the duplicate copy is also similar to original and as such, the one can create charge or lien with the help of duplicate copy.
21.            Schedule of property
The property must be described in schedule of the deed as advised in the Registration Act. The details how to describe a property is already dealt in previous pages of the book.  If any inadvertent errors is noticed on comparison with recital of the deed or with any other documents, and it touch and alter the very root of document, the error has to be corrected.
The schedule is to be verified with drawings, field measurements, maps and boundaries. Any inaccuracy is to be corrected by rectification deed. The rectification deed is one which corrects the inadvertent ministerial errors found in previous document. The error includes negligent clerical error, typographical error or C&P (Copy and Paste) error.

Various Frauds - 3

                      Various Frauds - Continued
Fraud – 5, found in the GPA
http://titleopinion.blogspot.in/In the year 2004, a man bought a large piece of land at Sriperumpudur and it is understood that later in 2007, he decided to sell the same and accordingly he appointed an agent vide a GPA and registered the same in 2007 in the jurisdictional SRO, where the property is situated. Both the documents, viz.,  the original sale deed and the GPA, were registered in the same SRO and both were affixed with photo of same person. The agent tried to sell the land. The purchaser got the copies of the documents from the agent and in turn gave it to proplawyer for opinion on title of the property.
The lawyer, on scrutiny of the documents, found that LTIs available on these two documents were different. Hence, he advised the client to contact the owner and confirm the appointment of agent for sale of property.
It was further found that the original owner had not proposed to sell the land and not appointed any agent. Somebody fraudulently registered the impugned GPA and tactically managed to affix the photo of owner on GPA during registration.
Then the owner of the property lodged a criminal complaint and the consequences are outside the scope of this book.
Fraud – 6, found on Scrutinizing a death certificate (Xerox),
A Xerox of a death certificate studied wherein it is certified that Mr.A expired on 21.05.2002, it is also noted that a sale deed was executed and registered by the said Mr.A along with his brothers on 15.05.2002.
It was doubted why Mr.A died within six days from the day of registration. So again the Xerox of the death certificate was scrutinized, whereby it was found that the date ‘21’ written in different colour (Xerox), then the legal heir certificate was brought from the clients and studied, there also the date ‘21’ had a correction and was entered in a different colour and the handwriting also differed from the rest of certification matters.
While inquiry, it is found that Mr.A died on 06.05.2002 and his brothers sold the family joint property and impersonated Mr.A without the knowledge of legal heirs of Mr.A
It was advised to get the ratification deed executed by the legal heirs of Mr.A and hence possible challenges and the claims were avoided.
Fraud – 7, found by Legal Heir Certificate
A client proposed to buy a flat from a builder approached a property lawyer and produced copies of all documents whatever the builder gave to him.
The lawyer arranged the documents and deeds in chronological order and on going through the latest title deed, he got struck up where the evolution of property was described.
It was recited that the present owner, who is selling the land, has got the ownership right intestate from his maternal aunt [mother’s sister]. It was understood from other documents that his aunt died heirless and originally got the property and its ownership from her husband by succession.
Normally, if a Hindu female died intestate and heirless, her property shall return back to the origin, her husband herein. As such, the lawyer got doubt and verified the legal heir certificate wherein he found that the name of self claimed owner is written in a different coloured ink and the handwriting also differed.
That is to say that his name was fraudulently inserted in the legal heir certificate.
Hence, the lawyer advised his client accordingly.


Various Frauds - 2

Various Frauds - Continued
Impersonation fraud - 1, found by Identity Card details
The documents related to a property were produced to proplawyer for scrutiny and opinion. From the last document, it was found that the owner is Mr.G.Balaji, son of Mr.Gopal residing at Chitlapakkam. He has produced a identity card whereby it is shown as his name is G.Balaji son of K.Gopal.
The previous document, a sale deed, was studied. The claimant (Purchaser) of the said deed was Mr.G.Balaji son of S.Gopal resident of Sithalapakkam.
On further verification, it was found that the said G.Balaji of Chitlapakkam has self claimed as the owner of the property with malafied intention and tried to sell the same.
The lawyer has to scrutiny the id card for expansion of initial, address and all comprehensively.
Impersonation fraud – 2, found by Identity Card details
A landed property (vacant plot) was purchased in the year 2002 by one, a native of Thirunelveli and for the time being residing at Chennai (Arumbakkam). His id card is driving license with No.12345 issued at Thirunelveli.
Later, in the year 2008, he decided to sell it and hence he appointed an agent, ‘X’, a resident of Arumbakkam and executed a GPA (General Power of Attorney) wherein the id of executant is shown as a driving license with No.1177 issued at Chennai in the year 2002.
Based on the GPA, Mr.X tried to sell vacant plot and gave copies/ Xerox of all documents to the probable buyer, who had given it to a prop-lawyer.
The lawyer on seeing the two different driving license for a same person got a suspicion that the person who appointed Mr.X as his agent and executed the GPA may not be the same person who has originally bought the piece of plot with id card #12345 as one person can’t have two licenses.
The lawyer advised the client accordingly.
Fraud – 3, found on Comparison with electoral roll
In a preventive check, while scrutinizing the required documents of a property, it is found by a proplawyer that details about voter id card as mentioned in a document about the executant are not correct on comparing with the electoral list as available on the internet.
Accordingly the client was advised.
In a nut shell, it is advised to be vigilant about the frauds and impersonation and the details are to be verified with websites, QR code regarding the voter id, aadhar cards, etc. The family cards are not accessible at present though available on net.

Fraud – 4, found by Recital in the GPA
A woman bought a plot in Madippakkam in the year 2003 and now she lives in Ahmedabad and wants to sell the plot in the year 2016 and hence appointed one as her agent to deal with the said vacant plot.
The lawyer place three basic questions:
1.                 What is the reason behind the sales?
2.                 What is the reason for appointment of GPA?
3.                 What is reason for appointing the particular person as her agent?
The reason for first question is (might be), she bought the property long year back, now she lives at a distance place, the property being a vacant site may not fetch any considerable yielding and hence she might have decided to dispose it. This gives convincing answer.
As she resides at Ahmedabad, a distance place from the property location of Chennai, she might have thought that it was prudent to appoint a suitable agent. Thus second question also answered.
As far as the third question concerned, there is no pre-existing relationship, between the owner and the agent, could be established from the documents available before him. Hence, he decided to dig the matter further in order to form an opinion. He compared the LTI of the women as available in the sale deed of the year 2003 and that in GPA of 2016 and found those LTIs are not the same.

That is a woman tried to sell the property of another woman and cheated others. The matters subsequently happened are irrelevant to and not under the scope of our discussion, hence we leave here itself.

TO KNOW MORE ABOUT FRAUDS, CLICK HERE

Various Frauds - Impersonation

Various Frauds
Let us see, what impersonation is?
One, Mrs.Kanaka purchased a land in Madippakkam in 1987 and she has not made building. As the plot was vacant for a quite long time, it attracted the land grabbers.
As a result, they forged a document purported to be the sale deed of 1987. They also created two fictitious persons, named Mrs.Kanaka and her daughter Mrs.Murugavalli. Based on the forged document, the impersonated Kanaka made a settlement deed, whereby she transferred the subject land to the fictitious Murugavalli, and registered the deed in SRO. This is fraudulent registration. Now, the original Kanaka wants to cancel the fraud deed.
Another lady, named Mrs.Subhadra, purchased a vacant land in 1990 from one Mr.Kumar, erected a building thereon and is living in that house. In 2010, a stranger visited her house and introduced himself as the agent of Kumar who sold the plot to Subhadra. He showed the Power of Attorney, appointing him as agent. He also claimed that Subhadra has not bought the plot from original Kumar. As such the sale became invalid. And he asked her to vacate from house and land.
Later, it is found that the self claimed agent was a fraudulent and the Power of Attorney was fraudulently registered by impersonation.  Now, she wants to cancel the GPA. Otherwise, the marketability of title shall be in question.
It is not possible to register a cancellation deed unilaterally as in the case of other deeds. It is considered that a cancellation of registered deed by executants is against public policy and also felt that by permitting the registration of cancellation deeds, the vendors or executants shall misuse the provisions and allowing it would amount to abuse of process of law.
The only remedy to the aggrieved party was to approach the competent Civil Court, which is lengthier and costlier one.

A curative remedy has been made by Registration department of Tamil Nadu provides not only relief to the aggrieved party but also prevents further fraud and cheating of innocent future purchasers. The mandatory procedure confers power of Executive Magistrate on District Registrar to make inquiry and to pass orders to annul the fraudulent registration.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT FRAUDS, CLICK HERE